Hart v. Seacoast Credit Corp.
This text of 174 A. 525 (Hart v. Seacoast Credit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The decree herein will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion hied in the court below by Yiee-Chancellor Bigelow.
We hnd it unnecessary to determine that four months* delay in seeking the approval of the board of public utility commissioners of the sale of such franchises would, under any and all circumstances, render the sale void. We express no opinion as to this. Nor is it necessary to review the holding below that “money in court or in the hands of an officer,” and “money due on a judgment,” are exempt from attachment.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Yan Buskiric, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
174 A. 525, 116 N.J. Eq. 573, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 1005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hart-v-seacoast-credit-corp-nj-1934.