Hart v. Proceeds of the Oakland

N.D. Ohio

Hart v. Proceeds of the Oakland

32 F. 234

DecidedApril 15, 1887

StatusPublished

This text of 32 F. 234 (Hart v. Proceeds of the Oakland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hart v. Proceeds of the Oakland, 32 F. 234 (N.D. Ohio 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Upon the questions whether this money was the proceeds of the vessel, and whether libelant had a lien thereon, Welicer, J., found that the money in the hands of Goulder was the proceeds of the sale of the remnants of the vessel; and that the libelant had a lion upon the said proceeds in the hands of Goulder, the same as he would have had against the vessel for his unpaid wages, and was not bound to receive the pro rata amount thereof; and decreed that Goulder should pay to him the amount of his wages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon the questions whether this money was the proceeds of the vessel, and whether libelant had a lien thereon, Welicer, J., found that the money in the hands of Goulder was the proceeds of the sale of the remnants of the vessel; and that the libelant had a lion upon the said proceeds in the hands of Goulder, the same as he would have had against the vessel for his unpaid wages, and was not bound to receive the pro rata amount thereof; and decreed that Goulder should pay to him the amount of his wages.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 F. 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hart-v-proceeds-of-the-oakland-ohnd-1887.