Hart v. Plum

14 Cal. 148
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1859·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinions

On the motion to dismiss the appeal, the following opinion jyas delivered by Terry, C. J.—Baldwin, J. concurring:

In all cases appealed the statute requires that the Appellant shall furnish the Court with a copy of the notice of appeal, the judgment roll, and the statement, if there be one.” (Pr. Act. Sec. [153]*153846.) The record in this case contains no copy of the pleadings, and therefore docs not meet the requirements of the statute.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hart v. Plum, 14 Cal. 148 (Cal. 1859).

14 Cal. 148 (Hart v. Plum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blalock v. Ridgway
267 P. 713 (California Court of Appeal, 1928)
Bossen v. Bean
216 P. 404 (California Court of Appeal, 1923)
State v. Johnson
156 P. 579 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1916)
Idaho Ry., Light & Power Co. v. Monk
218 F. 682 (D. Idaho, 1914)
Board of Education v. Shepherd
135 P. 605 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1913)
Miller v. County of Kern
90 P. 119 (California Supreme Court, 1907)
Porphyry Paving Co. v. Ancker
37 P. 1050 (California Supreme Court, 1894)
State ex rel. Miller v. Buchanan
24 W. Va. 362 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1884)
State v. Northern Belle Mill & Mining Co.
15 Nev. 385 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1880)
People v. Eureka Lake & Yuba Canal Co.
48 Cal. 143 (California Supreme Court, 1874)
Cross v. City of Milwaukee
19 Wis. 509 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1865)
Guy v. Washburn
23 Cal. 111 (California Supreme Court, 1863)