Hart v. Owen Steel Company

CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedApril 15, 2015
Docket2015-UP-196
StatusUnpublished

This text of Hart v. Owen Steel Company (Hart v. Owen Steel Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hart v. Owen Steel Company, (S.C. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

John Hart, Claimant, Appellant,

v.

Owen Steel Company, Employer, and Old Republic Insurance Company, Carrier, Respondents.

Appellate Case No. 2013-001094

Appeal From The Workers' Compensation Commission

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-196 Submitted March 26, 2015 – Filed April 15, 2015

AFFIRMED

Stephen Benjamin Samuels, of Samuels Law Firm, LLC, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Weston Adams III and Jason Wendell Lockhart, of Columbia, and Helen F. Hiser, of Charleston, all of McAngus Goudelock & Courie, LLC, and M. McMullen Taylor, of Mullen Taylor, LLC, of Columbia, for Respondents. PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Griffith v. Griffith, 332 S.C. 630, 646, 506 S.E.2d 526, 534 (Ct. App. 1998) ("The entitlement of the [party] to an award of attorney's fees is not appealed, and is therefore the law of the case."); Green v. City of Columbia, 311 S.C. 78, 80, 427 S.E.2d 685, 687 (Ct. App. 1993) ("The findings of fact and law by the [single] commissioner become and are the law of the case, unless within the scope of the appellant's exception to the [Appellate Panel] and its notice to the respondent of the issues the respondent would be required to meet." (emphasis added)); id. at 80–81, 427 S.E.2d at 687 (finding the Appellate Panel did not have authority to reach an issue because the litigant did not raise it in his application for review before the Appellate Panel and due process requires litigants receive notice of the issue to be met on appeal).

AFFIRMED.1

THOMAS, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Green v. City of Columbia
427 S.E.2d 685 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1993)
Griffith v. Griffith
506 S.E.2d 526 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hart v. Owen Steel Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hart-v-owen-steel-company-scctapp-2015.