HART v. O.F. OBERLANDER
This text of HART v. O.F. OBERLANDER (HART v. O.F. OBERLANDER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WILLIE HART, : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-CV-3533 : D.F. OBERLANDER, et al., : Defendants. :
ORDER AND NOW, this 11th day of January, 2021, upon consideration of Plaintiff Willie Hart’s Amended Complaint (ECF No. 11), it is ORDERED that: 1. For the reasons stated in the Court’s Memorandum, Hart’s claims based on his October 2013 arrest and his claims against Defendant Gwendolyn N. Bright for sentencing him as a sexually violent predator are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). 2. For the reasons stated in the Court’s Memorandum, the remainder of the claims in Hart’s Amended Complaint are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). The dismissal is without prejudice to Hart filing a new case only in the event his underlying conviction is reversed, vacated, or otherwise invalidated. 3. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case. BY THE COURT:
/s/ Juan R. Sánchez JUAN R. SÁNCHEZ, C.J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
HART v. O.F. OBERLANDER, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hart-v-of-oberlander-paed-2021.