HART v. O.F. OBERLANDER

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 11, 2021
Docket2:20-cv-03533
StatusUnknown

This text of HART v. O.F. OBERLANDER (HART v. O.F. OBERLANDER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
HART v. O.F. OBERLANDER, (E.D. Pa. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WILLIE HART, : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-CV-3533 : D.F. OBERLANDER, et al., : Defendants. :

ORDER AND NOW, this 11th day of January, 2021, upon consideration of Plaintiff Willie Hart’s Amended Complaint (ECF No. 11), it is ORDERED that: 1. For the reasons stated in the Court’s Memorandum, Hart’s claims based on his October 2013 arrest and his claims against Defendant Gwendolyn N. Bright for sentencing him as a sexually violent predator are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). 2. For the reasons stated in the Court’s Memorandum, the remainder of the claims in Hart’s Amended Complaint are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). The dismissal is without prejudice to Hart filing a new case only in the event his underlying conviction is reversed, vacated, or otherwise invalidated. 3. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case. BY THE COURT:

/s/ Juan R. Sánchez JUAN R. SÁNCHEZ, C.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Heck v. Humphrey
512 U.S. 477 (Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
HART v. O.F. OBERLANDER, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hart-v-of-oberlander-paed-2021.