Hart v. Oatman

New York Supreme Court

Hart v. Oatman

1 Barb. 229

DecidedOctober 25, 1847

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Barb. 229 (Hart v. Oatman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hart v. Oatman, 1 Barb. 229 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1847).

Pincite

Opinion

Edmonds, J.

On the principle established by the court of errors, in Henry v. Bank of Salina, (5 Hill, 523,) the plaintiff in interest in the suit is intended by the statute; rather than the party to the record. And as by granting the motion the plaintiff would lose a trial, it must be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Edmonds, J.

On the principle established by the court of errors, in Henry v. Bank of Salina, (5 Hill, 523,) the plaintiff in interest in the suit is intended by the statute; rather than the party to the record. And as by granting the motion the plaintiff would lose a trial, it must be denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Barb. 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hart-v-oatman-nysupct-1847.