Hart v. Moon
This text of 6 Cal. 161 (Hart v. Moon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mr. Chief Justice Murray concurred.
The decision of Zander v. Coe, limiting the jurisdiction of justices in civil cases, does not apply to proceedings under the statute concerning forcible entry. The motion for non-suit was properly overruled, as there was abundant evidence introduced by plaintiff to justify a verdict in his favor.
The points that the pleadings were insufficient to justify the judgment, and that the Court erred in trebling the damages assessed by the jury, have heretofore been decided in the case of O’Callaghan v. Booth and Deal, at the October term, 1855.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Cal. 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hart-v-moon-cal-1856.