Hart v. Mangum

91 S.E. 543, 146 Ga. 497, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 361
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 15, 1917
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 91 S.E. 543 (Hart v. Mangum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hart v. Mangum, 91 S.E. 543, 146 Ga. 497, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 361 (Ga. 1917).

Opinion

Beck, J.

In a petition for the writ of habeas corpus it was alleged, that the defendant, the sheriff of Fulton County, Georgia, illegally held the petitioner under arrest; that in July, 1911, he was arrested by officers of the State of Tennessee under an indictment in that State for the offense of burglary; that subsequently, and while he was thus in the custody of the proper authorities of the State of Tennessee, they voluntarily delivered him to the marshal of the United States, who took him to Memphis, Tennessee, where he was sentenced by the district court of the United States to serve a sentence of five years in the Federal penitentiary at Atlanta; that since then he has been continuously in the custody of the officers of the United States; that the sheriff of Fulton county holds him under, an order of the Governor of Georgia, commanding his delivery to the officers of the State of Tennessee under a requisition issued by the Governor of that State, it being claimed that petitioner is a fugitive "from justice from that State, which he denies. Held, that the denial of the writ of habeas corpus was proper. Kelly v. Mangum, 145 Ga. 57 (88 S. E. 556), and cases there cited.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Habeas corpus. Before Judge Hill. Fulton superior court. May 1, 1916. Troutman é Troutman, for plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clark v. Commissioner of Correction
917 A.2d 1 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2007)
Prince v. State
279 So. 2d 539 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1973)
Hanford v. Grimes
132 S.E.2d 75 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1963)
In Re Fedder
299 P.2d 881 (California Court of Appeal, 1956)
Williams v. Mount
29 S.E.2d 704 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
King v. Mount
26 S.E.2d 419 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
People Ex Rel. Barrett v. Bartley
50 N.E.2d 517 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1943)
Deering v. Mount
22 S.E.2d 828 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
State Ex Rel. Brown v. Grosch
152 S.W.2d 239 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1941)
Scheinfain v. Aldredge
12 S.E.2d 868 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Brown v. Lowry
195 S.E. 759 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Bartlett v. Lowry
182 S.E. 850 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)
The People v. Klinger
149 N.E. 799 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 S.E. 543, 146 Ga. 497, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hart-v-mangum-ga-1917.