Hart v. Mallet.

Superior Court of North Carolina

Hart v. Mallet.

3 N.C. 136

Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided July 5, 1801·Published

Opinion

■Et per Johnston, Judge.

I am very loth to dismiss this bill, which I understand has been many years upon the docket % but the authorities are too strong and pointed for me to get over.— Jurisdiction cannot be given to a court by the admission of parties, when it has not jurisdiction of the subject matter without such admission.

Net the bill be dismissed, each party paying half the costs,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

■Et per Johnston, Judge.

I am very loth to dismiss this bill, which I understand has been many years upon the docket % but the authorities are too strong and pointed for me to get over.— Jurisdiction cannot be given to a court by the admission of parties, when it has not jurisdiction of the subject matter without such admission.

Net the bill be dismissed, each party paying half the costs,

Hart v. Mallet., 3 N.C. 136 (N.C. Ct. App. 1801).

Pincite

3 N.C. 136 (Hart v. Mallet.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.