Hart v. Huckins

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Hart v. Huckins

5 Mass. 260

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedMay 15, 1809

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Mass. 260 (Hart v. Huckins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hart v. Huckins, 5 Mass. 260 (Mass. 1809).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court adjudged that the petitioner should take nothing by his petition, as by the statute of 1795, c. 41. § 3., commonly called the fee bill, constables are authorized to serve writs in personal actions only, and in those only where the damage sued for does not exceed seventy dollars. The plaintiff may bring his writ of error, and reverse the judgment by which he considers himself aggrieved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court adjudged that the petitioner should take nothing by his petition, as by the statute of 1795, c. 41. § 3., commonly called the fee bill, constables are authorized to serve writs in personal actions only, and in those only where the damage sued for does not exceed seventy dollars. The plaintiff may bring his writ of error, and reverse the judgment by which he considers himself aggrieved.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Mass. 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hart-v-huckins-mass-1809.