Hart v. Hart
31 A. 352, 167 Pa. 13, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 853
Opinion
This case was rightly decided in the court below. A claim for the benefit of the exemption law need not be in writing: Keller v. Bricker, 64 Pa. 379. It may be made within a reasonable time after the defendant has notice of the writ provided it does not delay the sale of the goods or the land levied on.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hart v. Hart, 31 A. 352, 167 Pa. 13, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 853 (Pa. 1895).
31 A. 352 (Hart v. Hart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moore v. McMorrow
5 Pa. Super. 559 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1897)
H. G. Beetem & Co. v. Getz
5 Pa. Super. 71 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1897)