Hart v. Hart

2 Edw. Ch. 207, 1834 N.Y. LEXIS 369, 1834 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 13
New York Court of Chancery·Decided July 14, 1834·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The Vice-Chancellor:

I have looked into the report and the affidavit annexed to it; but cannot think enough is shown to prove any act of adultery. The latter merely sets forth that the defendant is living separate from his wife and has a woman residing with him. No other cohabitation is proved. The court will not grant a decree in such a case upon conjectures. I must have stronger testimony before I make a decree. This report may go back to the master, for the purpose of giving the complainant an opportunity to strengthen the testimony.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hart v. Hart, 2 Edw. Ch. 207, 1834 N.Y. LEXIS 369, 1834 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 13 (N.Y. 1834).

2 Edw. Ch. 207 (Hart v. Hart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Axtell v. Axtell
119 N.Y.S. 644 (New York Supreme Court, 1909)
Hutchinson v. Hutchinson
53 Misc. 438 (New York Supreme Court, 1907)