Hart v. Hart

526 So. 2d 216, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1380, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2377, 1988 WL 57751
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 9, 1988·No. No. 87-1808·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellee concedes that the “lump sum, non-modifiable alimony ... of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per month for thirty-six (36) consecutive months” should not have been made terminable upon the “Wife’s remarriage, death or cohabitation with an adult male ...” and that condition is hereby stricken. Except as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED as MODIFIED.

SHARP, C.J., and ORFINGER and COBB, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hart v. Hart, 526 So. 2d 216, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1380, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2377, 1988 WL 57751 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

526 So. 2d 216 (Hart v. Hart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Medina v. State
526 So. 2d 216 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)