Hart v. Harrison
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This suit, in the civil Court of Florence County, was on an account growing out of a written contract, which will be reported. There was a directed verdict in favor of the plaintiff, who is the respondent here. The defendant’s motion for a new trial was refused. The appeal is from the direction of verdict and the refusal to grant the new trial asked for.
Upon a careful examination of the record, it is our opinion that the order of Judge Sharkey, refusing the motion for a new trial, sufficiently covers the issues involved in the case, and properly disposes of all the exceptions. It will be reported. The judgment below is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
152 S.E. 17 (Hart v. Harrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.