Hart v. France
156 So. 2d 775
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 8, 1963·No. No. 63-109·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The defendant to an action for services rendered has appealed a final judgment for the plaintiff based on a jury verdict. Appellant’s main argument is that the evidence does not support the verdict. We have reviewed the evidence, together with the various rulings of the court assigned as error, and we hold that the judgment must be affirmed upon the rule stated in Western Union Tel. Co. v. Thomas, 139 Fla. 474, 190 So. 878.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hart v. France, 156 So. 2d 775 (Fla. Ct. App. 1963).
156 So. 2d 775 (Hart v. France) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Keller v. Florida Power & Light Company
156 So. 2d 775 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)