Hart v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
MYRTIS PAULO HART, Plaintiff, V. Civ. No. 21-1124 KG-SCY FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, et al, Defendants. ORDER OF DISMISSAL This matter is before the Court following Plaintiffs failure to prosecute his pro se Prisoner Claim for Damage, Injury, or Death. (Doc. 1) (Complaint). The Complaint seeks alleges various entities discriminated against Plaintiff after the Federal Bureau of Investigation “blacklisted” him. (Doc. 1) at 1. The docket reflects a recent mailing to Plaintiff was returned as undeliverable. (Doc. 10). It appears he was released from custody without advising the Court of his new address, as required by D.N.M. LR-Civ. 83.6. By an Order entered March 16, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiff to notify the Clerk of his new address within thirty days. (Doc. 11). Plaintiff was warned that the failure to timely comply may result in dismissal of this case without further notice. The Order was also returned as undeliverable, and Plaintiff did not update his address by the April 15, 2022 deadline. Hence, the Court will dismiss the Complaint without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P.41(b). That rule permits dismissal for the “failure to prosecute [and] comply with the ... court’s orders.” Olsen v. Mapes, 333 F.3d 1199, 1204 n. 3 (10 Cir. 2003). IT IS ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's Prisoner Claim for Damage, Injury, or Death (Doc. 1) is dismissed without prejudice.
2. The Court will enter a separate judgment closing this civil case.
ontce STATES 4 NIcT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hart v. Federal Bureau of Investigation (Hart v. Federal Bureau of Investigation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.