Hart v. Faulkener

New York Supreme Court

Hart v. Faulkener

5 Johns. 362

DecidedFebruary 15, 1810

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Johns. 362 (Hart v. Faulkener) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hart v. Faulkener, 5 Johns. 362 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1810).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an original application to the court, and counter-affidavits are admissible, according to the established course of practice. The affidavit read on the part of the plaintiff, is positive as to the cause of action, and amply sufficient to hold the defendant to bail; and the amount as fixed by the recorder, is not unreasonable. The motion ought, therefore, to be denied, with costs.

Rule refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an original application to the court, and counter-affidavits are admissible, according to the established course of practice. The affidavit read on the part of the plaintiff, is positive as to the cause of action, and amply sufficient to hold the defendant to bail; and the amount as fixed by the recorder, is not unreasonable. The motion ought, therefore, to be denied, with costs.

Rule refused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Johns. 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hart-v-faulkener-nysupct-1810.