Hart v. Department of Highways

West Virginia Court of Claims

Hart v. Department of Highways

12 Ct. Cl. 52

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedDecember 12, 1977

DocketNo. CC-77-124

StatusPublished

This text of 12 Ct. Cl. 52 (Hart v. Department of Highways) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hart v. Department of Highways, 12 Ct. Cl. 52 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The claimant and the respondent filed a written stipulation with the Court in which the parties stipulated that the respondent, on June 28, 1977, was making certain maintenance repairs utilizing welding rods on the Williamstown Bridge on W.Va. Route 14 at Williamstown, Wood County, West Virginia. It was further stipulated that the respondent’s employees left pieces of welding rod material on the bridge after completing the day’s work. At or about 6:00 p.m. the same day, the claimant’s motorcycle tire and tube were punctured by a piece of welding rod material as he was proceeding across the bridge, sustaining damage in the amount of $46.49.

The Court, believing that liability exists on the part of the respondent and that the damages are reasonable, hereby makes an award of $46.49 to the claimant.

Award of $46.49.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The claimant and the respondent filed a written stipulation with the Court in which the parties stipulated that the respondent, on June 28, 1977, was making certain maintenance repairs utilizing welding rods on the Williamstown Bridge on W.Va. Route 14 at Williamstown, Wood County, West Virginia. It was further stipulated that the respondent’s employees left pieces of welding rod material on the bridge after completing the day’s work. At or about 6:00 p.m. the same day, the claimant’s motorcycle tire and tube were punctured by a piece of welding rod material as he was proceeding across the bridge, sustaining damage in the amount of $46.49.

The Court, believing that liability exists on the part of the respondent and that the damages are reasonable, hereby makes an award of $46.49 to the claimant.

Award of $46.49.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 Ct. Cl. 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hart-v-department-of-highways-wvctcl-1977.