Hart v. Delaware, L. & W. Railroad
This text of 31 N.Y.S. 1128 (Hart v. Delaware, L. & W. Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Although I adhere to the opinion which I have expressed upon the previous appeals in this case (22 N. Y. Supp. 3; 27 N. Y. Supp. 767), that the evidence failed to disclose any negligence upon the part of the defendant justifying a recovery in this action, my associates having differed from me upon this question, this judgment must die affirmed. There does not seem to be any such ■difference in the presentation of the question of .•negligence upon this appeal as would call for a different ruling from that which obtained upon the previous appeals. The judgment and order appealed from must therefore be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 N.Y.S. 1128, 91 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 605, 64 N.Y. St. Rep. 873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hart-v-delaware-l-w-railroad-nysupct-1895.