Hart v. Conner, & Taylor

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hart v. Conner, & Taylor

21 Ga. 384

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 15, 1857

DocketNo. 81

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Ga. 384 (Hart v. Conner, & Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hart v. Conner, & Taylor, 21 Ga. 384 (Ga. 1857).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

Lumpkin, J.

delivering the opinion.

We see no error in the judgment of the Circuit Court. The contract in this case was sufficiently certain. It really is nothing more nor-less than a due bill for money loaned. It was an advance, to say the most of it, by Conner & Taylor for five hundred dollars to Hart upon the faith of cotton to [386]*386be forwarded to them in thirty days by the defendant. If not immediately due, it certainly was at the end of the thirty days. It is for Hart to plead and prove payment in cotton or otherwise.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

Lumpkin, J.

delivering the opinion.

We see no error in the judgment of the Circuit Court. The contract in this case was sufficiently certain. It really is nothing more nor-less than a due bill for money loaned. It was an advance, to say the most of it, by Conner & Taylor for five hundred dollars to Hart upon the faith of cotton to [386]*386be forwarded to them in thirty days by the defendant. If not immediately due, it certainly was at the end of the thirty days. It is for Hart to plead and prove payment in cotton or otherwise.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Ga. 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hart-v-conner-taylor-ga-1857.