Hart v. Clifton

19 Tex. 56
Texas Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1857·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Hemphill, Ch. J.

In this case there was judgment by default, and the defendant assigns in substance for error, that there was no legal service of the citation.

The return of the Sheriff on the citation is as follows : “ Executed the 9th day of August, 1856, by delivering to “ William F. B. Hart, certified copies of plaintiff’s.”

By law the Sheriff is required to deliver to a defendant a copy of the citation, and a copy of the petition, and he must state fully the time and manner of the service. Hart. Dig. Art. 811, 2894, 679.

The return does not show such service as is required by law. In fact it shows no service, and is wholly defective. The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hart v. Clifton, 19 Tex. 56 (Tex. 1857).

19 Tex. 56 (Hart v. Clifton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. McLean
268 S.W. 179 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1924)
James v. Watson
2 Posey 741 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1881)
Graves v. Dorman Holmes & Co.
1 White & W. 16 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1877)
Johnson v. Barthold
43 Tex. 556 (Texas Supreme Court, 1875)
Batey v. Dibrell & Brother
28 Tex. 172 (Texas Supreme Court, 1866)