Hart v. Brunswick
222 A.D. 831
Opinion
Judgment modified by deducting therefrom the sum of $412.38, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. There is no proof of damages under the items for taxi [832] hire, “ cord easing,” or depreciation. The court was in error in adding interest. Interest in this ease was a question for the jury. (Wilson v. City of Troy, 135 N. Y. 96; Regan v. City of New York, 175 App. Div. 861.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hart v. Brunswick, 222 A.D. 831 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).
222 A.D. 831 (Hart v. Brunswick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wilson v. . City of Troy
32 N.E. 44 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)
Regan v. City of New York
175 A.D. 861 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)