Hart v. Brunswick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hart v. Brunswick

222 A.D. 831

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1928

StatusPublished

This text of 222 A.D. 831 (Hart v. Brunswick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hart v. Brunswick, 222 A.D. 831 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment modified by deducting therefrom the sum of $412.38, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. There is no proof of damages under the items for taxi [832]*832hire, “ cord easing,” or depreciation. The court was in error in adding interest. Interest in this ease was a question for the jury. (Wilson v. City of Troy, 135 N. Y. 96; Regan v. City of New York, 175 App. Div. 861.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment modified by deducting therefrom the sum of $412.38, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. There is no proof of damages under the items for taxi [832]*832hire, “ cord easing,” or depreciation. The court was in error in adding interest. Interest in this ease was a question for the jury. (Wilson v. City of Troy, 135 N. Y. 96; Regan v. City of New York, 175 App. Div. 861.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Hagarty, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

222 A.D. 831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hart-v-brunswick-nyappdiv-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack