Hart v. Baldwin

Eighth Circuit

Hart v. Baldwin

372 F. App'x 684

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided April 23, 2010·No. No. 09-3639·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Iowa inmate Stanley Hart appeals the district court’s¹ order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. We conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (exhaustion of administrative remedies). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Iowa inmate Stanley Hart appeals the district court’s¹ order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. We conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (exhaustion of administrative remedies). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Hart v. Baldwin, 372 F. App'x 684 (8th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

372 F. App'x 684 (Hart v. Baldwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related