Hart v. A.L. Clark & Co.

60 Misc. 366, 113 N.Y.S. 451
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1908·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Dayton, J.

Plaintiff has moved the Appellate Division for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, which motion may not be decided until October next. Plaintiff asks a stay pending that decision. Owing to this unavoidable delay a situation is presented not within any adjudication to which I have been referred. Defendant contends that the Special Term is without power to grant this stay. I have concluded, however, to do so, on condition that plaintiff within five days give a sufficient bond in $300- to indemnify the defendant for costs at the Appellate Division as taxed, and also for any loss or damage caused the defendant if the Appellate Division shall deny said motion. Settle order seventh inst.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hart v. A.L. Clark & Co., 60 Misc. 366, 113 N.Y.S. 451 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1908).

60 Misc. 366 (Hart v. A.L. Clark & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hart v. A. L. Clarke & Co.
114 N.Y.S. 1130 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)