Hart v. A.L. Clark & Co.

60 Misc. 366, 113 N.Y.S. 451
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1908
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 60 Misc. 366 (Hart v. A.L. Clark & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hart v. A.L. Clark & Co., 60 Misc. 366, 113 N.Y.S. 451 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1908).

Opinion

Dayton, J.

Plaintiff has moved the Appellate Division for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, which motion may not be decided until October next. Plaintiff asks a stay pending that decision. Owing to this unavoidable delay a situation is presented not within any adjudication to which I have been referred. Defendant contends that the Special Term is without power to grant this stay. I have concluded, however, to do so, on condition that plaintiff within five days give a sufficient bond in $300- to indemnify the defendant for costs at the Appellate Division as taxed, and also for any loss or damage caused the defendant if the Appellate Division shall deny said motion. Settle order seventh inst.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hart v. A. L. Clarke & Co.
114 N.Y.S. 1130 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 Misc. 366, 113 N.Y.S. 451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hart-v-al-clark-co-nysupct-1908.