Hart v. Adams

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION

JONATHAN ANDREW HART, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 6:24-cv-53 V. WARDEN ROBERT ADAMS, et al., Defendants.

ORDER The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation for the Court to dismiss Plaintiff's claims against CoreCivic. Doc. 18. Plaintiff did not file Objections to this Report and Recommendation, and the time to do so has elapsed. Accordingly, upon review, | find no clear error in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and ADOPT the Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (llth Cir, 2006) (If no specific objections are made or no objections are made at all, “the appropriate standard of review for the report and recommendation is clear error.”). I DISMISS Plaintiff's claims against CoreCivic. Plaintiffs claims against Defendants Adams, Sikes, Larisee, Taylor, and Carter remain pending. Doc. 19. SO ORDERED, this ph day of September, 2025.

\ TtA a TORABPE J. RANDAT. HALL STATES DISTRICT COURT 2RN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA