Hart Silas v. Colvin
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE DIVISION
CHARMAINE MARIE HART SILAS CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:18-cv-00121
VERSUS JUDGE JAMES
U.S. COMMISSIONER, MAGISTRATE JUDGE HANNA SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
JUDGMENT
This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Hanna for report and recommendation. After an independent review of the record, and noting the absence of any objections, this Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).1 More particularly, the Commissioner is instructed to reconsider whether the claimant experienced medical improvement and to explain the evidence that supports medical improvement, if any, on any particular
1 A fourth sentence remand constitutes a final judgment that triggers the filing period for an EAJA fee application. Shalala v. Schaeffer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Freeman v. Shalala, 2 F.3d 552, 553 (5th Cir. 1993). date, and to reevaluate the claimant’s residual functional capacity. The claimant shall be afforded the opportunity to submit updated medical evidence and to testify at another hearing. Signed this 25th day of June, 2019.
□□ Gelert ROBERT G. JAMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hart Silas v. Colvin (Hart Silas v. Colvin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.