Harstrick v. Harstrick

298 A.D.2d 429, 748 N.Y.S.2d 264, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9865

This text of 298 A.D.2d 429 (Harstrick v. Harstrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harstrick v. Harstrick, 298 A.D.2d 429, 748 N.Y.S.2d 264, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Gartenstein, J.H.O.), dated August 14, 2001, as awarded the plaintiff the sum of $17,443 as an attorney’s fee.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the trial court providently exercised its discretion in awarding an attorney’s fee to the plaintiff (see DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 NY2d 879, 881). Feuerstein, J.P., McGinity, Luciano and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DeCabrera v. Cabrera-Rosete
518 N.E.2d 1168 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
298 A.D.2d 429, 748 N.Y.S.2d 264, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harstrick-v-harstrick-nyappdiv-2002.