Harston v. Commonwealth
474 S.W.2d 354
Opinion
Appellant Sherrill Harston was found guilty of uttering forged checks in violation of KRS 434.130(2). He appeals, claiming only that his motions for a directed verdict of acquittal should have been sustained because “(t)he Commonwealth failed to prove the bank upon which the checks were written was authorized by law to do a general banking business.” Such proof was unnecessary. Francis v. Commonwealth, Ky., 468 S.W.2d 287 (1971).
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harston v. Commonwealth, 474 S.W.2d 354 (Ky. Ct. App. 1971).
474 S.W.2d 354 (Harston v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Francis v. Commonwealth
468 S.W.2d 287 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1971)