Harshbarger v. Harshbarger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Harshbarger v. Harshbarger

37 A.D.2d 597, 323 N.Y.S.2d 214, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3851

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 37 A.D.2d 597 (Harshbarger v. Harshbarger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harshbarger v. Harshbarger, 37 A.D.2d 597, 323 N.Y.S.2d 214, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for separation, plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered February 25, 1971, as, on reargument, adhered to the court’s original order, entered February 1, 1971, granting her motion for temporary alimony, child support, counsel fees, etc., to a limited extent. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. The best protection for a spouse in a case such as this is to seek a speedy trial in which the facts can be fully developed. An award of temporary alimony should have no effect upon the Trial Judge in his determination as to the amount of permanent alimony to be awarded (cf. Leonard v. Leonard, 1 A D 2d 981). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Munder, Latham, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for separation, plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered February 25, 1971, as, on reargument, adhered to the court’s original order, entered February 1, 1971, granting her motion for temporary alimony, child support, counsel fees, etc., to a limited extent. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. The best protection for a spouse in a case such as this is to seek a speedy trial in which the facts can be fully developed. An award of temporary alimony should have no effect upon the Trial Judge in his determination as to the amount of permanent alimony to be awarded (cf. Leonard v. Leonard, 1 A D 2d 981). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Munder, Latham, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 A.D.2d 597, 323 N.Y.S.2d 214, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harshbarger-v-harshbarger-nyappdiv-1971.