Harshal S. Patel v. PlainsCapital Bank
This text of Harshal S. Patel v. PlainsCapital Bank (Harshal S. Patel v. PlainsCapital Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS and Opinion Filed November 24, 2015
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-01350-CV
HARSHAL S. PATEL, Appellant V. PLAINSCAPITAL BANK, Appellee
On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-14216
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Before the Court is appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal.
If an appellant timely files a motion for new trial, the notice of appeal is due ninety days after the
date the judgment is signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a). An extension of time may be granted
if an appellant files a notice of appeal within fifteen days of the deadline and then files a motion
complying with rule of appellate procedure 10.5(b). See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Without a timely
filed notice of appeal, this Court lacks jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(b).
The judgment was signed on July 15, 2015. Appellant filed a timely motion for new trial,
making the notice of appeal due on October 13, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a). Appellant
filed his notice of appeal on November 3, 2015. The notice of appeal was untimely filed and
outside of the period of time for obtaining an extension. Accordingly, we deny appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal and dismiss the appeal for want of
jurisdiction. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
151350F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
HARSHAL S. PATEL, Appellant On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas. No. 05-15-01350-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-14216. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. PLAINSCAPITAL BANK, Appellee Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.
It is ORDERED that appellee PLAINSCAPITAL BANK recover its costs of this appeal from appellant HARSHAL S. PATEL.
Judgment entered November 24, 2015.
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Harshal S. Patel v. PlainsCapital Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harshal-s-patel-v-plainscapital-bank-texapp-2015.