Harry Wilfong v. Legend Bank, N.A.
This text of Harry Wilfong v. Legend Bank, N.A. (Harry Wilfong v. Legend Bank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-12-00467-CV
HARRY WILFONG APPELLANT
V.
LEGEND BANK, N.A. APPELLEE
------------
FROM THE 97TH DISTRICT COURTOF MONTAGUE COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
On April 22, 2013, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as
required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P.
38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless
appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within
ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R.
App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for
want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.
DELIVERED: May 16, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Harry Wilfong v. Legend Bank, N.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harry-wilfong-v-legend-bank-na-texapp-2013.