Harry v. State

828 So. 2d 1076, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15509, 2002 WL 31374837
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 23, 2002·No. No. 4D02-811·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions but remand for re-sentencing in case no. 99-1623, on Counts I and II, under Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000)(two concurrent equal sentences under habitual felony offender statute and prison releasee reof-fender statute violate prison releasee reof-fender statute).

POLEN, C.J., KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harry v. State, 828 So. 2d 1076, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15509, 2002 WL 31374837 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

828 So. 2d 1076 (Harry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Niles v. Mallardi
828 So. 2d 1076 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)