Harry v. Schwalbert
829 S.W.2d 129, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 839, 1992 WL 103043
Opinion
ORDER
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harry v. Schwalbert, 829 S.W.2d 129, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 839, 1992 WL 103043 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).
829 S.W.2d 129 (Harry v. Schwalbert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.