Harry v. INS

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided March 22, 1994·No. 93-2004·Published

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion


March 22, 1994 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

___________________

No. 93-2004

EDSEL R. HARRY,

Petitioner,

v.

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

__________________

ON PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER
OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS

___________________

Before

Breyer, Chief Judge,
___________
Cyr and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
______________

___________________

Edsel R. Harry on brief pro se.
______________
Frank W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, Robert Kendall,
_______________ _______________
Jr., Assistant Director, and Karen Fletcher Torstenson, Attorney,
__ _________________________
Office of Immigration Litigation Civil Division, on brief for
respondent.

__________________

__________________

Per Curiam. We have carefully reviewed the record
__________

and conclude that the decision to deny relief from

deportation fell within the broad range of the Board's

permissible discretion. See, e.g., Palacios-Torres v. INS,
___ ___ _______________ ___

995 F.2d 96, 99-101 (7th Cir. 1993).

The petition for review is denied.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harry v. INS, (1st Cir. 1994).

Harry v. INS (Harry v. INS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related