Harry Sommers Inc. v. Dickey

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Harry Sommers Inc. v. Dickey

152 S.E. 590, 41 Ga. App. 286, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 539

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 5, 1930

Docket20208

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 152 S.E. 590 (Harry Sommers Inc. v. Dickey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harry Sommers Inc. v. Dickey, 152 S.E. 590, 41 Ga. App. 286, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 539 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, an assignment of error upon a refusal to grant a nonsuit will not be considered where the case proceeds to verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and thereafter the defendant makes a motion for a new trial in which he alleges that the verdict was unauthorized by the evidence.

2. In the light of the facts of the ease, the several grounds of the motion for a new trial complaining of the charge of the court show no reversible error.

[287]*287Decided March 5, 1930. Alston, Alston, Foster & Moise, William Hart Sibley, for plaintiff in error. A. W. White, A. C. Corbett, contra.

3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke cmd Bloodworth, JJ., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI