Harry Rubin & Sons, Inc. v. Clay Equipment Corp.
658 N.E.2d 210, 86 N.Y.2d 819, 634 N.Y.S.2d 433, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 3597
This text of 658 N.E.2d 210 (Harry Rubin & Sons, Inc. v. Clay Equipment Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Harry Rubin & Sons, Inc. v. Clay Equipment Corp., 658 N.E.2d 210, 86 N.Y.2d 819, 634 N.Y.S.2d 433, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 3597 (N.Y. 1995).
Opinion
Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the filed stipulation is not a valid stipulation for judgment absolute within the meaning of CPLR 5601 (c).
Judge Levine taking no part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
658 N.E.2d 210, 86 N.Y.2d 819, 634 N.Y.S.2d 433, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 3597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harry-rubin-sons-inc-v-clay-equipment-corp-ny-1995.