Harry Pinsky & Son Co. v. Wike
141 A. 920, 103 N.J. Eq. 18, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 628
Opinion
The decree appealed from -will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning, and reported in 101 N. J. Eq. 45.
■ For affirmance — The Ciiiee-Justice, Trenchard, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Parker, Minturn, JJ. 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harry Pinsky & Son Co. v. Wike, 141 A. 920, 103 N.J. Eq. 18, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 628 (N.J. 1928).
141 A. 920 (Harry Pinsky & Son Co. v. Wike) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chesebro-Whitman Co., Inc. v. EDENBORO APTS.
207 A.2d 186 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1965)