Harry M. Blair, Robert Owston v. George W. McClintic Judge, Etc

304 U.S. 580
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 31, 1938·No. 1021·Published

Opinion

304 U.S. 580

58 S.Ct. 1058

82 L.Ed. 1542

Harry M. BLAIR, Robert Owston, et al., petitioners,
v.
George W. McCLINTIC, Judge, etc.

No. 1021.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 31, 1938

Messrs. George Pfeil, of New York City, Poffenbarger & Poffenbarger, of Charleston, W. Va., and John Levi Clark, of New York City, for petitioners.

Messrs. White & Clapp and Hepburn & Norris, all of Philadelphia, Pa., Hines, Rarick, Door & Hammond, of New York City, Steptoe & Johnson, of Charleston, W. Va., and T. R. White of Philadelphia, Pa., for First Mortg. Bondholders Protective Committee, Thomas Hart, of Philadelphia, Pa., for Debentureholders Protective Committee, Charles A. Marshall, of New York City, for Dean & Co. and Wiley & Co., Stanley C. Morris and W. E. Miller, both of Charleston, W. Va., for respondents.

For opinion below, see Matter of Blair, 95 F.2d 995.

The motion to defer consideration is denied. The petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is denied.

Mr. Justice ROBERTS took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.

Rehearing denied 59 S.Ct. 59, 83 L.Ed. ——.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harry M. Blair, Robert Owston v. George W. McClintic Judge, Etc, 304 U.S. 580 (1938).

304 U.S. 580 (Harry M. Blair, Robert Owston v. George W. McClintic Judge, Etc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Blair
95 F.2d 995 (Fourth Circuit, 1938)