Harry Lewis v. Meshulam Riklis and Aits, Inc.
This text of 575 F.2d 416 (Harry Lewis v. Meshulam Riklis and Aits, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Harry LEWIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Meshulam RIKLIS and AITS, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 979, Docket 78-7123.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued May 18, 1978.
Decided May 22, 1978.
David Lopez, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.
Martin A. Coleman, New York City (Toni Robinson and Rubin, Baum, Levin, Constant & Friedman, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee Meshulam Riklis.
Before KAUFMAN, Chief Judge, and MULLIGAN and VAN GRAAFEILAND, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This appeal from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Charles H. Tenney, Judge, is affirmed on the opinion below (S.D.N.Y.1978), 446 F.Supp. 582.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
575 F.2d 416, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 11056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harry-lewis-v-meshulam-riklis-and-aits-inc-ca2-1978.