Harry Lester Zook v. Pauline E. Zook
233 F.2d 369, 98 U.S. App. D.C. 167, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3160
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order of the District Court granting maintenance *370 and support pendente lite in a suit for absolute divorce to which a counterclaim for maintenance and support was filed.
Such an award is within the discretion of the trial court unless there is a showing of abuse of discretion. There is no such showing in this case. The judgment of the District Court must be affirmed.
It is not necessary to pass upon appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harry Lester Zook v. Pauline E. Zook, 233 F.2d 369, 98 U.S. App. D.C. 167, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3160 (D.C. Cir. 1956).
233 F.2d 369 (Harry Lester Zook v. Pauline E. Zook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kreuz v. Kreuz
354 A.2d 867 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1976)