Harry Lester Zook v. Pauline E. Zook

233 F.2d 369, 98 U.S. App. D.C. 167, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3160
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMay 10, 1956
Docket13046
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 233 F.2d 369 (Harry Lester Zook v. Pauline E. Zook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harry Lester Zook v. Pauline E. Zook, 233 F.2d 369, 98 U.S. App. D.C. 167, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3160 (D.C. Cir. 1956).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court granting maintenance *370 and support pendente lite in a suit for absolute divorce to which a counterclaim for maintenance and support was filed.

Such an award is within the discretion of the trial court unless there is a showing of abuse of discretion. There is no such showing in this case. The judgment of the District Court must be affirmed.

It is not necessary to pass upon appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kreuz v. Kreuz
354 A.2d 867 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
233 F.2d 369, 98 U.S. App. D.C. 167, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harry-lester-zook-v-pauline-e-zook-cadc-1956.