Harry L. Sivley, Special Deputy Receiver of Comprehensive Health Services of Texas, Inc., D/B/A Wellchoice v. Comprehensive Health Services, Inc.
This text of Harry L. Sivley, Special Deputy Receiver of Comprehensive Health Services of Texas, Inc., D/B/A Wellchoice v. Comprehensive Health Services, Inc. (Harry L. Sivley, Special Deputy Receiver of Comprehensive Health Services of Texas, Inc., D/B/A Wellchoice v. Comprehensive Health Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-08-00144-CV
Harry L. Sivley, Special Deputy Receiver of Comprehensive Health Services of Texas, Inc., d/b/a Wellchoice, Appellant
v.
Comprehensive Health Services, Inc., Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-00-001863, HONORABLE MARGARET A. COOPER, JUDGE PRESIDING
NO. 03-08-00148-CV
Harry L. Sivley, Special Deputy Receiver of Comprehensive Health Services of Texas, Inc., d/b/a Wellchoice, Appellant
N.S. Rangarajan, Robert B. Low, James W. Patton, Stanley R. Kirk, Mark D. Keshishian, and Jeffrey Richardon, Appellees
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-03-00001, HONORABLE MARGARET A. COOPER, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION
On February 12, 2009, at the joint request of the parties, we abated these appeals to
give the parties time to resolve their disputes. On March 19, the parties filed joint motions to
dismiss, explaining that they have finalized the settlement of their disputes and asking that we
dismiss the appeals.1 We grant the motions and dismiss both appeals.
___________________________________________
David Puryear, Justice
Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Pemberton Chief Justice Law Not Participating
Dismissed on Joint Motion
Filed: March 26, 2009
1 The parties ask that we dismiss the appeals with prejudice. The phrase “with prejudice” is used when disposing of a case at the trial court level, but when this Court dismisses an appeal, it does so without any such notation. See, e.g., Tex. R. App. P. 42.1 (appellate court may dismiss appeal on motion of appellant or by joint agreement).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Harry L. Sivley, Special Deputy Receiver of Comprehensive Health Services of Texas, Inc., D/B/A Wellchoice v. Comprehensive Health Services, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harry-l-sivley-special-deputy-receiver-of-comprehe-texapp-2009.