Harry H. Oshrin v. Emma B. Underwood

Fifth Circuit

Harry H. Oshrin v. Emma B. Underwood

296 F.2d 733, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 2898

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedDecember 21, 1961

Docket18938

StatusPublished

This text of 296 F.2d 733 (Harry H. Oshrin v. Emma B. Underwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harry H. Oshrin v. Emma B. Underwood, 296 F.2d 733, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 2898 (5th Cir. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Court has carefully studied the record and briefs in this case. We hold that the district court did not err in refusing to find for the appellant on the theory of a breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment. We affirm too the dis *734 trict court’s holding that the evidence offered by the plaintiff-appellant to show damages was insufficient to support any tenable theory of recovery.

The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Court has carefully studied the record and briefs in this case. We hold that the district court did not err in refusing to find for the appellant on the theory of a breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment. We affirm too the dis *734 trict court’s holding that the evidence offered by the plaintiff-appellant to show damages was insufficient to support any tenable theory of recovery.

The judgment is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

296 F.2d 733, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 2898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harry-h-oshrin-v-emma-b-underwood-ca5-1961.