Harry Gregory v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company

191 F.2d 856, 29 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2022
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided October 17, 1951·No. 11356_1·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.'

This appeal was heard upon the record, briefs and arguments of counsel;

And it appearing that the Findings of Fact by the District Judge are in accordance with the stipulation of the parties-herein, and that his -Conclusions of Law correctly apply the legal principles applicable thereto ;

It is ordered that, for the reasons given-by the District Judge in said Conclusions-of Law and upon the authority of Aeronautical Lodge v. Campbell, 337 U.S. 521, 69 S.Ct. 1287, 93 L.Ed. 513, and Raulins v. Memphis Union Station Co., 6 Cir., 168 F.2d 466, the judgment of the District Court, herein appealed from, is affirmed 92 F.Supp. 770.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harry Gregory v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, 191 F.2d 856, 29 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2022 (6th Cir. 1951).

191 F.2d 856 (Harry Gregory v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Derlyn E. Moe v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.
246 F.2d 215 (Fifth Circuit, 1957)
Bostian v. Seaboard Air Line R. Co.
211 F.2d 867 (Fourth Circuit, 1954)