Harry Glimp v. Charles Brosch, Jr.

Tenth Circuit

Harry Glimp v. Charles Brosch, Jr.

274 F.2d 829

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedNovember 18, 1959

Docket6173_1

StatusPublished

This text of 274 F.2d 829 (Harry Glimp v. Charles Brosch, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harry Glimp v. Charles Brosch, Jr., 274 F.2d 829 (10th Cir. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

274 F.2d 829

Harry GLIMP
v.
Charles BROSCH, Jr., et al.

No. 6173.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Nov. 18, 1959.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma.

Harry D. Moreland, Tulsa, Okl., for appellant.

Ungerman, Grabel, Ungerman, Leiter & Unruh, Charles A. Whitebook and John T. Gibson, Tulsa, Okl., and Jack B. Sellers, Drumright, Okl., for appellees.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge, and CHRISTENSON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

274 F.2d 829

Harry GLIMP
v.
Charles BROSCH, Jr., et al.

No. 6173.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Nov. 18, 1959.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma.

Harry D. Moreland, Tulsa, Okl., for appellant.

Ungerman, Grabel, Ungerman, Leiter & Unruh, Charles A. Whitebook and John T. Gibson, Tulsa, Okl., and Jack B. Sellers, Drumright, Okl., for appellees.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge, and CHRISTENSON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

274 F.2d 829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harry-glimp-v-charles-brosch-jr-ca10-1959.