Harry G. Seaboldt v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Thompson Mahogany Company, Third-Party

317 F.2d 363, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5125
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 31, 1963·No. 14269·Published

Opinion

317 F.2d 363

Harry G. SEABOLDT
v.
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. THOMPSON MAHOGANY COMPANY,
Third-Party Defendant, Appellant.

No. 14269.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued May 23, 1963.
Decided May 31, 1963.

Lynn L. Detweiler, Philadelphia, Pa. (Swartz, Campbell & Henry, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

F. Hastings Griffin, Jr., Phildelphia, Pa. (William J. Sharkey, Dechert, Price & Rhoads, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before KALODNER, STALEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On review of the record we find no error. The District Court's Order and Judgment dated October 26, 1962 will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harry G. Seaboldt v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Thompson Mahogany Company, Third-Party, 317 F.2d 363, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5125 (3d Cir. 1963).

317 F.2d 363 (Harry G. Seaboldt v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Thompson Mahogany Company, Third-Party) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.