Harry G. Seaboldt v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Thompson Mahogany Company, Third-Party

Third Circuit

Harry G. Seaboldt v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Thompson Mahogany Company, Third-Party

317 F.2d 363, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5125

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMay 31, 1963

Docket14269

StatusPublished

This text of 317 F.2d 363 (Harry G. Seaboldt v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Thompson Mahogany Company, Third-Party) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harry G. Seaboldt v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Thompson Mahogany Company, Third-Party, 317 F.2d 363, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 5125 (3d Cir. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

317 F.2d 363

Harry G. SEABOLDT
v.
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. THOMPSON MAHOGANY COMPANY,
Third-Party Defendant, Appellant.

No. 14269.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued May 23, 1963.
Decided May 31, 1963.

Lynn L. Detweiler, Philadelphia, Pa. (Swartz, Campbell & Henry, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

F. Hastings Griffin, Jr., Phildelphia, Pa. (William J. Sharkey, Dechert, Price & Rhoads, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before KALODNER, STALEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On review of the record we find no error. The District Court's Order and Judgment dated October 26, 1962 will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI