Harry Edison Hackworth v. William H. Hiatt, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia
This text of 184 F.2d 517 (Harry Edison Hackworth v. William H. Hiatt, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Notwithstanding appellant, in previous proceedings, including one under Sec. 2255, Title 28 U.S.C.A. and several by habeas corpus, had made, and had had decided against him on full hearing, the same contentions, his petition for habeas corpus was entertained and a full hearing was granted him below. This appeal is from the judgment upon that hearing, which, in accordance with the judgments in the previous proceedings, rejected appellant’s claims as unfounded and denied the relief he sought.
It is quite plain that the judgment must be affirmed. It is quite plain, too, that the abuse of process evidenced by these successive filings must have an end.
The judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
184 F.2d 517, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harry-edison-hackworth-v-william-h-hiatt-warden-united-states-ca5-1950.