Harry E. Peebles v. National Collegiate Athletic Association

887 F.2d 1080
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 7, 1989·No. 89-2344·Unpublished

Opinion

887 F.2d 1080
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Harry E. PEEBLES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 89-2344.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 31, 1989.
Decided: Sept. 21, 1989.
Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied Nov. 7, 1989.

Harry E. Peebles, appellant pro se.

William L. Pope (Pope & Rodgers), for appellee.

Before HARRISON L. WINTER, K.K. HALL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Harry E. Peebles appeals from the district court's order dismissing his civil action for lack of standing. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Peebles v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, CA-88-2463 (D.S.C. Feb. 10, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harry E. Peebles v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, 887 F.2d 1080 (4th Cir. 1989).

887 F.2d 1080 (Harry E. Peebles v. National Collegiate Athletic Association) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Nash (Earl)
887 F.2d 1080 (Fourth Circuit, 1989)