Harry Carroll Kirk v. United States
324 F.2d 506
Opinion
It appearing that appellant had the services of counsel chosen by him at the time of his plea and sentence, we conclude that the trial court did not err in denying his motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harry Carroll Kirk v. United States, 324 F.2d 506 (5th Cir. 1963).
324 F.2d 506 (Harry Carroll Kirk v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Federal custody; remedies on motion attacking sentence
28 U.S.C. § 2255