Harry Carroll Kirk v. United States
324 F.2d 506
This text of 324 F.2d 506 (Harry Carroll Kirk v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Harry Carroll Kirk v. United States, 324 F.2d 506 (5th Cir. 1963).
Opinion
It appearing that appellant had the services of counsel chosen by him at the time of his plea and sentence, we conclude that the trial court did not err in denying his motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Federal custody; remedies on motion attacking sentence
28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
324 F.2d 506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harry-carroll-kirk-v-united-states-ca5-1963.