Harry A. Volz Abstract Co. v. Bodley

261 N.W. 668, 63 S.D. 540
CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedJune 25, 1935
DocketFile No. 7760
StatusPublished

This text of 261 N.W. 668 (Harry A. Volz Abstract Co. v. Bodley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harry A. Volz Abstract Co. v. Bodley, 261 N.W. 668, 63 S.D. 540 (S.D. 1935).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a proceeding in mandamus wherein the plaintiff seeks to compel the defendants as the “Abstracters’ Board” of this state (chapter 1, Laws 1929) to issue to plaintiff a certificate authorizing it to engage in the business of making and compiling abstracts of title to real property in the counties of Tripp and Todd.

The matter was tried in the circuit court in Tripp county. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were favorable to defendants, and judgment was entered dismissing plaintiff’s petition, and from this judgment plaintiff appeals. Pending the appeal the defendants, as the abstracters’ board, pursuant to a new application on the part of plaintiff, issued to plaintiff the certificate sought in this proceeding. This being the only remedy asked by the plaintiff, there is no longer any controversy between the parties; therefore, the appeal will be, and hereby is, dismissed without costs.

Dismissed.

WARREN, P. J., and POLLEY, CAMPBELL and ROBERTS, JJ., concur. RUDOLPH, J., absent and not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 N.W. 668, 63 S.D. 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harry-a-volz-abstract-co-v-bodley-sd-1935.