Harry A. Volz Abstract Co. v. Bodley
This text of 261 N.W. 668 (Harry A. Volz Abstract Co. v. Bodley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a proceeding in mandamus wherein the plaintiff seeks to compel the defendants as the “Abstracters’ Board” of this state (chapter 1, Laws 1929) to issue to plaintiff a certificate authorizing it to engage in the business of making and compiling abstracts of title to real property in the counties of Tripp and Todd.
The matter was tried in the circuit court in Tripp county. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were favorable to defendants, and judgment was entered dismissing plaintiff’s petition, and from this judgment plaintiff appeals. Pending the appeal the defendants, as the abstracters’ board, pursuant to a new application on the part of plaintiff, issued to plaintiff the certificate sought in this proceeding. This being the only remedy asked by the plaintiff, there is no longer any controversy between the parties; therefore, the appeal will be, and hereby is, dismissed without costs.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
261 N.W. 668, 63 S.D. 540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harry-a-volz-abstract-co-v-bodley-sd-1935.