Harrower v. Betts

2 Cow. 496
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1824
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Cow. 496 (Harrower v. Betts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harrower v. Betts, 2 Cow. 496 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1824).

Opinion

Curia.

It seems that the plaintiff would be allowed to retain the venue, on such a stipulation, though the defendant have the greater number of witnesses in the county to which he moves to change it. (Worthy v. Gilbert, 4 John. Rep. 492.) But the defendant has no right to change the venue upon stipulating to pay the expense of the plaintiff’s witnesses.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Worthy v. Gilbert
4 Johns. 492 (New York Supreme Court, 1809)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Cow. 496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrower-v-betts-nysupct-1824.