Harrower v. Betts

2 Cow. 496
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 15, 1824·Published

Opinion

Curia.

It seems that the plaintiff would be allowed to retain the venue, on such a stipulation, though the defendant have the greater number of witnesses in the county to which he moves to change it. (Worthy v. Gilbert, 4 John. Rep. 492.) But the defendant has no right to change the venue upon stipulating to pay the expense of the plaintiff’s witnesses.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrower v. Betts, 2 Cow. 496 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1824).

2 Cow. 496 (Harrower v. Betts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Worthy v. Gilbert
4 Johns. 492 (New York Supreme Court, 1809)